I'm often asked, "So how did you do it?" I used the same strategy I use today when modeling a lesson with students. Basically, I begin by asking students a question like this: "If I observe you experiencing success, what would it look like?.... sound like? After students have time to self-reflect and record their thoughts, I solicite full group responses. From there we create a chart with three major headings. My goal is to get students to decide the three major categories with my guidance. More specific sub-categories are bulleted beneath the three major headings. Throughout this process I question and further probe students as a means to achieve more sophisticated responses and more sophisticated vocabulary to represent their ideas. An example of a chart I facilitated with a sixth grade class looked like this:
On-task
*
Engagement
*
Responsibility
*
Perseverance or sticks with it
|
Cooperation
*
Team work
*
Shares ideas
* Listens
to others/each
other
* Puts ideas on the table
|
Thinking
*
Solves problems
*
Asks questions
* Reflects on work
*
Revises work
|
Mary Anne, why don't you share your rubric on this posting and elaborate on how you extended this process as a critical piece of a cooperative learning setting? I believe it would be helpful to anyone who is not accustomed to facilitating student input into classroom "agreements". I agree that the more the teacher becomes the facilitator of student learning instead of the provider of sage information or facts, the more likely students are to have genuine interest and participation in the learning.
ReplyDeleteWill do, Larry, in a new post! I also want to empahsize that there are multiple possibilities for sub-categories under the major headings. My chart in the post is just a sample. For instance, often students will add "staying in their seat" or "staying with their group'" to the "On-task" heading, which I find interesting, since I generally have not led them in that direction through my guided questions. I suppose their prior experience influences that particular response. I do establish guidelines regarding movement when setting up tasks; however, there is flexibility depending on the task.
ReplyDeleteYour point is well taken. All these things are criteria for appropriate behaviors and engagement, both individual and collaborative.
I agree and the chart is very helpful. When students have ownership of the rules and really understand why they are needed the classroom climate improves. As far as cooperative learning --- I have spent time early this year educating students on how talking about what they are learning--- -- is proven to improve brain connections and improve memory....but ofcourse only if they stay on topic. This does seem to help keep them on task I am a big believer in taking time to develop relationships early..taking the extra time to get to know them instead of just delving right into the standards .
ReplyDeleteI thank you for your comments! I sadly, remember so well a day when I was teaching middle school, that I realized my students did not know the names of the other students in the class. It was a turning point in my career! Now, at the time I had a class with 60 students and I thought I had to get right down to business. What I did not realize that was until I had established a safe, comfortable environment, I would never experience the best outcome from my students. This is an incredible testimony to the imortance of relationships! Not just teacher to student, but student to student! I went to your new blog site. One of my former students is reading Carol Dweck. I have just purchased her lastest book. Looking forward to reading it! Hope you will keep connecting!
DeleteHey Mary Anne! Glad to see you've stepped out with the blog, since You have so much to share.
ReplyDeleteOne subtle thing you do that may contribute to kids being responsive to this approach is asking "If I observe YOU having success..." Really personalizes it so that students reflect on their individual experiences rather than some abstract vision of what success does or should look like. It's a good model for what we should be doing all the time.