As
promised to my friends and colleagues in the field, I am posting a document
with revised language, which addresses the facilitation aspect of the Socratic
Seminar.
Those
who know me know… I live in revision! Hope this helps!
Socratic Seminar Purpose: The
purpose of the Socratic Seminar is to increase understanding: understanding of
textual and conceptual ideas and values, as well as understanding of self and
others.
“The seminar is a collaborative, intellectual dialoged facilitated
with open-ended questions about text and ideas.
Key components:
- Choosing
the text
- Preparing
the questions
- Facilitating
the dialogue
- Engaging student participation
Text should be characterized as:
- Filled
with ideas and values: “An idea is a thought, mental conception,
mental map, or notion. A value
is that which is desirable or worthy of esteem for its own safe; thing or
quality having intrinsic worth.” (Webster’s
Dictionary)
- Complex
and challenging: The text requires reading and rereading; is
not easily disposed of.
- Relevant
to participants: Has a clear connection to students’ lives and
connects thinking and dialogue with curricular standards.
- Notably
ambiguous: It can be thought about and viewed from multiple
perspectives.
Seminar logistics:
- All sit in a circle with only enough chairs for participants.
- Talk
time is shared, so it
isn’t necessary to raise hands.
- Questions
may be posed to the full group or as a pair share.
- Students’ names are visible through either placing table tents in front of them or wearing name tags.
The role of the seminar facilitator is to nurture
participation and inclusiveness, as well as to foster and support meaningful,
deep dialogue, not to impart his or her
opinion. The facilitator comments on
process, but not content. The goal is
that participants experience increased understanding of important content and
concepts, the text, self and others.
1.
Read the text carefully, underlining key words and defining those words you
might not understand, marking important sentences and paragraphs, and jotting
down main points.
2.
Prepare questions as follows:
·
a.
An opening question that everyone around the table can answer in succession.
This question should interest you and the members of the group. It can be about
something you were made to think about by the reading.
·
b.
A few closed (or convergent) questions that require recall from the text, and
hold participants accountable for the reading.
·
c.
Several open (or divergent) questions for which there will be no right answers.
·
d.
At least one core question that focuses on the central message of the piece.
·
e. The questioning sequence moves from questions
that are more specifically content related to questions that connect content to
the students’ lives. The closing question always has real world application.
3.
Form a circle and lead the discussion with the following tasks in mind:
·
a.
State the questions and listen carefully.
·
b.
Ask students to refer to the text and other evidence to support their
responses.
·
c.
Keep the group on task, using a variety of strategies to engage all students.
·
d.
Remember, you are not to be the expert with all the right answers. You are a facilitator who guides the group
through the process.
4. Pose questions to the full group, as well as assigned pairs in the group. For more
complex questions, or during those times when students appear insecure to
speak, it can be beneficial to allow time for students to engage in dialogue
with a partner before opening up the conversation with the full group.
Facilitator Role:
- Listen
actively to each participant and form follow-up questions based on
student comments.
- Think
about the ideas and values expressed in the dialogue, the depth as well as
the diversity of points of view.
- Question
the participants in a manner to foster increased understanding, noting the
flow of the conversation.
- Limit
teacher talk turns and talk time while taking steps to distribute
increased talk turns and talk time among participants.
- Map the seminar by recording the amount and type of participation, as well as the ideas that are shared. You may use a rubric or discussion score sheet.
The role of seminar participant is to engage in the dialogue
process. Participants are consistently
challenged to expand and refine their seminar participation skills.
- Think deeply about the ideas and values
expressed in the dialogue, examining the various perspectives with an open
mind.
- Refer to text and ideas by citing specific
information and quoting actual passages to support a point of view. Discuss ideas rather than opinions;
demonstrate poise and self-control.
(In other words, your emotions are not
evidence of fact!)
- Address
others respectfully by using others’ names.
- Agree constructively by adding and
making connections to the comments of others. Respectfully disagree constructively by saying phrases such as, “I disagree
with ______ because ____________.”
- Listen
by looking at the speaker, perhaps taking notes, and not talking while another is talking. (No sidebars. No interruptions.)
- Share the talk time as a group; be polite and
take turns.
- Speak
loudly enough for everyone to hear, asking questions as well as making
statements, while looking at others.