Liana Heitin in her recent
article for Education Week cited three key skills critical for deep reading
comprehension. Along with academic
language and complex reasoning, is perspective-taking, which is defined as the
ability to recognize that different actors have different experiences of the
same event.
I’ve been pondering a lead
for this post for days, and then WOW, here it is! So back to my focus, and why am
I asking you to “beware of your already always listening”? As I brought to the forefront in my post on
conflict resolution, our minds are molded by our prior knowledge and life
experiences. This is the lens which
gives us our view of life’s events and how the world unfolds. However, we
become handicapped if the experiences that have formed our opinions and values
become biases, closing our minds to the perspectives of others, particularly those
who are different, or those who do not think or share the same opinions and
values we do.
The Harvard Business
School calls this System 1 thinking, meaning automatic judgement is formed,
which stems from association stored in memory, rather than logically working
through ALL available information. Obviously, this concept isn’t exclusive to
schools. We’re probably all thinking about FaceBook right now. (A little humor never hurt anyone, I suppose.)
This concept is relevant
threefold to the way we interact with one another in school settings: adults
with adults, adults with children and children with children. A significant
point to remember, children will most often mimic the behavior and model the
culture established by the adults. Children enter school fairly innocent and
accepting. Only as they grow do we see biases forming, primarily through parental,
and other adult or societal influence, which includes life experience. As educators and parents we are important!
The point is: if we are
not aware of our “already always listening,” as actors with different
experiences, our interactions can become a cautionary tale. It’s more than
feelings hurt and friends lost: we are missing out on reading, comprehending,
thinking and communicating at the deepest and highest levels. This ability
impacts both relationships and learning!
We know our “already
always listening” is present if we tend to read only material that supports our
“already formed opinion”. It’s easy to
do. On any given subject, one can locate
a text, article, podcast, video, etc. to support his or her opinion and/or
data. Sadly, this concept is modeled
beautifully by public leaders of nearly every social institution in our
country, politicians and the media, which makes the challenge for our schools
even greater.
Why does it matter? I’ll go back to those three critical skills
for reading and thinking. There is a
higher level challenge posed in analyzing a diverse perspective. The best
debaters and the best persuasive writers understand thoroughly the argument of
the opposing side. Consider also that purposeful focus on respectful language
and honoring another’s viewpoint reinforces listening skills, critical to
literacy development and communication skills.
We cannot erase our prior
knowledge, nor is that what I’m implying.
We use our prior knowledge as the basis for all future learning.
But here
is what we can do:
- In our schools, our charge is to offer students both sides of the story and opportunities to experience multiple perspectives. Provide a variety of texts with diverse viewpoints.
- Provide opportunities for reflection after experiencing text on (1) the author’s perspective and how the author uses language and techniques to influence the reader and (2) how interaction with the text has impacted the student’s thinking.
- Set protocols for safe engagement in non-judgmental and non-stereotypical conversations. Stereotyping crosses ethnicity, gender, religion, politics…whatever! No one owns a license in this category.
- Seek common ground. Stop drawing a line in the sand!
- Be aware of your own “already always listening” in an intentional effort to be more accepting of “other actors”.

This is a particularly relevant article given that right now at the beginning of the school year the tone, atmosphere, protocols, and culture of each classroom and setting is being established. Since bias is such a prevalent factor in learning for all ages, it would be of great benefit for teachers to have discussions with students for the purpose of developing a common understanding of this issue and appropriate ways to deal with the bias. It may be helpful if you could give us some teaching strategies and activities which would help facilitate this discussion. I really feel this is an issue we avoid in schools at the expense of student learning.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Mt. Lock- we must engage students in conversation about the fact that we all have bias and where are bias comes from. We need to help them understand why bias can be a very dangerous thing.The difficult part I believe is teaching students that it is still important to have personal standards and convictions and beliefs that we stand up for. What is the difference between having a standard or value and having a bias?? For instance, my daughter, who attended 12 years of catholic school and was the president of the ProLife club. Sometimes she makes comments that are very biased ==and I feel quite judgmental--about abortion. I've talked to her about how not everyone in the world has a huge family support system that she does...not everyone has had the spiritual training she has had...that sometimes people feel a desperation she has never felt--This is where I struggle with the concept--students need to see everything from different points of view --yet at the same time we do not want society to become wishy washy. Are there times when we do need to draw a line in the sand?I try to teach my daughter that before she can truly make an impact she must first empathize with women who have unwanted pregnancies. She has to really understand their pain and create solutions to help them support them. Yet I am very proud of her for having the value. Morgan and I even had a tough discussion about whether she should put her Pro Life presidency on her scholarship applications. What do you think? Would you put that on an application.
ReplyDeleteOfcourse the reason for thinking about not putting it on the application is the bias some people have towards Pro Lifers--lol
DeleteI understand your point, which frustrates me tremendously! I'll go back to my comment, "no one owns a license on stereotyping", yet higher education seems to think so. They have determined the bias in many cases. I would say it depends. What is the scholarship? Does the ProLife stance in any way relate to the content of the scholarship? Which school...liberal/conservative/neutral? Feel free to private message me to discuss.
DeleteYour question is excellent: What is the difference between a value and a bias?
ReplyDeleteThe things we value are considered important and worthy of our respect. They influence our behavior, our opinions and our attitudes regarding what is good and bad.
On the other hand, bias is viewed as an inclination for or against something, a prejudice to favor one perspective over another. It seems logical our values would influence our biases. If truthful, we all have them. It sounds okay. Now, here's the BUT! Bias is generally unfair, because the prejudice or tendency for one perspective or view point over another, lacks an open mindedness and a willingness to consider another's view point.
The essence of my point is to be aware of your biases. They impact so significantly how we communicate. The goal is to seek the ability to listen to another's viewpont respectfully, without aggressive language and behavior. We live in a world with multiple viewpoints on any given concept. The challenge is to know when to advocate and when to listen.
It seems you and your daughter have explored both sides of a highly, emotionally charged issue, which is a good thing. Were you able to do so without becoming too emotionally charged?